首页> 外文OA文献 >Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee.
【2h】

Contemporary accuracy of death certificates for coding prostate cancer as a cause of death: Is reliance on death certification good enough? A comparison with blinded review by an independent cause of death evaluation committee.

机译:当前将前列腺癌编码为死亡原因的死亡证明书的准确性:对死亡证明书的依赖是否足够好?独立死亡原因评估委员会与盲目审查的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurate cause of death assignment is crucial for prostate cancer epidemiology and trials reporting prostate cancer-specific mortality outcomes. We compared death certificate information with independent cause of death evaluation by an expert committee within a prostate cancer trial (2002-2015). Of 1236 deaths assessed, expert committee evaluation attributed 523 (42%) to prostate cancer, agreeing with death certificate cause of death in 1134 cases (92%, 95% CI: 90%, 93%). The sensitivity of death certificates in identifying prostate cancer deaths as classified by the committee was 91% (95% CI: 89%, 94%); specificity was 92% (95% CI: 90%, 94%). Sensitivity and specificity were lower where death occurred within 1 year of diagnosis, and where there was another primary cancer diagnosis. UK death certificates accurately identify cause of death in men with prostate cancer, supporting their use in routine statistics. Possible differential misattribution by trial arm supports independent evaluation in randomised trials.
机译:准确的死亡原因分配对于前列腺癌流行病学和报告前列腺癌特异性死亡率结果的试验至关重要。我们将死亡证书信息与由前列腺癌试验(2002-2015年)中的专家委员会进行的独立死亡原因评估进行了比较。在评估的1236例死亡中,专家委员会评估将523例(42%)归因于前列腺癌,与1134例死亡证明的死亡原因相符(92%,95%CI:90%,93%)。根据委员会的分类,死亡证书在识别前列腺癌死亡方面的敏感性为91%(95%CI:89%,94%);特异性为92%(95%CI:90%,94%)。在诊断后1年内发生死亡以及再次诊断为原发癌的地方,敏感性和特异性较低。英国死亡证明书可准确识别出前列腺癌男性的死亡原因,从而支持其在常规统计中的使用。试验部门可能造成的差异性错误归因支持在随机试验中进行独立评估。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号